2018年5月19日雅思大作文預測：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)能否代替實際旅游

　　參考題目

　　互聯(lián)網(wǎng)能否代替實際旅游 Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it...

　　互聯(lián)網(wǎng)能否代替實際旅游 Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　題型

　　討論觀點型

　　解題思路

　　1. 當然不能，學習文化可不是看看網(wǎng)頁那么簡單。舉例，只有通過零距離的觀察，聆聽和跟當?shù)厝诉M行交談，一個旅行者才能有深度地理解一個本土文化的獨特性，包括了日常的習俗，社會規(guī)范，宗教禁忌，以及說話和思維的方式。這些文化元素是無法通過網(wǎng)絡的圖片和文字描述的。 2. 此外，我對于那種“網(wǎng)絡萬能”的論調深表懷疑。事實上，今天，仍然存在很多國家和地區(qū)無法被互聯(lián)網(wǎng)所覆蓋，如朝鮮，以及貧窮的非洲國家。所以，了解它們文化的方式仍然是實地旅行。 3. 然而，就僅僅了解文化的某些成分，如在博物館的傳統(tǒng)藝術和古董，我認為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)已經(jīng)足夠強大來展現(xiàn)它們。舉例，電腦技術，如超高像素的照片，已經(jīng)能完全再現(xiàn)一件繪畫或是雕刻的所有細節(jié)了。所以在家看互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上的照片和視頻或獲得的文化體驗，跟實際的觀察沒有多少區(qū)別。

　　范文

　　Would the Internet substitute the practical traveling abroad, in terms of letting people learn foreign cultures? Personally, I believe this contention overestimates the function of the Internet, and my reasons will be expounded as below. The foremost reason against this assertion is that the essence of a culture is much more than simple images. In terms of helping tourists to have a deep understanding of a local culture in certain areas, the real-world international traveling, instead of the Internet, is still a primary means by which a person can immerse himself or herself in a live cultural environment to grasp the cultural cores. For example, by face-to-face interaction with local residents, including closely observing, talking, listening, a tourist can directly and practically feel every detail about local traditions, social manners and rules, the way of speaking and thinking, and religious taboos. In comparison, it is impossible for an Internet user to recover the multi-dimensional cultural experience by merely reading texts and pictures on the screen. In addition, I have a big doubt about the assertion that all information can be accessible on the Internet. In fact, for the sake of politics or economy, there are many countries which are still beyond the coverage of Internet, such as South Korea and countries in Africa. Similarly, in some religious areas like Tibet, the information of local culture is rare on the Internet, because visitors are forbidden to take photos inside historical buildings, temples and religious rituals. That is to say, practical traveling is the only way for people to watch and appreciate these cultures. Admittedly, the reason why people agree that the Internet can take the place of the real-world traveling is that modern computer technology has been able to fully reveal basic cultural elements. In fact, one feature of the Internet is its multi-media function, which can place the audience into a vivid virtual world by displaying texts, pictures, videos and audios about a culture simultaneously. In other words, all visual information about a culture, from traditional clothes to old buildings to artistic works, can be available for viewers at home, by browsing the Internet. In conclusion, this argument is indefensible. Although the Internet is capable of furnishing an easy and convenient access to the description of a culture based on texts, images and videos, an overall and in-depth understanding of a culture is more than what a person sees and hears. What is more, as for the countries exclusive from the Internet, it is only through practical journeys that people can really touch those arcane cultures.(426字)