亚洲欧洲国产欧美一区精品,激情五月亚洲色五月,最新精品国偷自产在线婷婷,欧美婷婷丁香五月天社区

      gYԇ

      (dng)ǰλãԇW(wng) >> gYԇ >> (j)Pg >> ģMԇ} >> 2019catti(j)PgģMԇ}Ї(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)sˮ

      2019catti(j)PgģMԇ}Ї(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģsˮ

      ԴԇW(wng)   2019-03-07 С

      2019catti(j)PgģMԇ}Ї(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)sˮ

      hgӢ

      Ј(bo)棺Ї(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)sˮ40%

      y(World Bank)ܹ¹Ӌ(j)(sh)(j)@ʾЇ(gu)ӡȵĽ(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģԭO(sh)ĵ40%

      (du)146(g)(jng)(j)wԪُ(gu)Iǰ1000NƷͷ(w)ăr(ji)Ӌ(j)yбʾ@ǡֹں(gu)ُ(gu)Iƽr(ji)Vص׵Ŭ

      ُ(gu)Iƽr(ji)(PPP)Ј(chng)Rʡҕ(du)ɱĸó߶?yn)ĺA(ch)Ǹ(g)ͥñ(gu)؛ُ(gu)IƷͷ(w)

      PPPӋ(j)(sh)(j)@ʾЇ(gu)˵ؔ(ci)p40%ռ翂a(chn)Ľ10%о@ʾЇ(gu)ȫڶ(jng)(j)w˾(gu)(ni)a(chn)ֵ(GDP)ֻ(gu)9.8%

      yL(zhng)_.(Robert Zoellick)ʾ(hu)¹Ӌ(j)(sh)(j)κ߽Y(ji)Փ”(sh)(j)Ї(gu)yO(sh)ÿ1Ԫؚµ˿ˎ׃|

      ˱ʾ(j)@Щy(tng)Ӌ(j)(sh)(j)Y(ji)Փr(sh)҂С֔(jn)a(b)@Щ(sh)(j)ԎЇ(gu)I(lng)(do)_l(f)

      ^Ї(gu)]ǰA(y)ǘӸ@ζЩЇ(gu)ҕκͽ(jng)(j){(gu)ƶ߿Է

      (gu)؟(z)(US Government Accountability Office)fĹ㔵(sh)(j)(bo)Qُ(gu)Iƽr(ji)Ӌ(j)Ї(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģ2012͕(hu)^(gu)Ї(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģ{(dio)(sh)(j)@ʾЇ(gu)܊»(jng)(j)(sh)߀Ҫ^ܶc(gu)ƥ

      yбʾЇ(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģտs?yn)^ȥ(j)ɿ^͔(sh)(j)M(jn)еĹЇ(gu)(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģ@Ї(gu)״΅cyеć(gu)H^Ӌ(j)(International Comparison Program)Ҳӡ1985ԁ״΅c@һӋ(j)

      yнy(tng)Ӌ(j)(sh)(j)@ʾӡȵĽ(jng)(j)Ҏ(gu)ģҲsp40%ȫĴ(jng)(j)wռa(chn)4%

      g

      The economies of China and India are 40 per cent smaller than previously thought, according to new estimates published by the World Bank this week.

      The ranking of 146 economies by buying power in US dollars was based on the prices of 1,000 goods and services in what the World Bank described as the most extensive and thorough effort ever to measure purchasing power parity across countries.

      PPP, rather than market exchange rates, is regarded as a better measure of the relative cost of living, since it is based on goods and services households can buy with their domestic currency.

      The new PPP estimates show a 40 per cent drop in the wealth of the Chinese people, accounting for nearly 10 per cent of world output. China remains the worlds second-largest economy but, in terms of per capita gross domestic product, it is only 9.8 per cent of the size of the US, according to the research.

      Robert Zoellick, the World Banks preseident said he was not drawing any policy conclusions about the new estimates, which suggest that there are hundreds of millions more Chinese living on the Worlds Banks poverty line of less than $1 a day.

      We must be careful about drawing conclusions about poverty from these statistics, he said but added that the figures could help Chinese leaders refine their development work.

      Nevertheless, if China is less wealthy than previously thought, it could mean that those US policymakers who regard it as a political and economic threat, can relax.

      For example, the US Government Accountability Office using the old estimates, reported this year that Chinas economy in PPP terms would be larger than the US by 2012. The recalibration of Chinas economy suggests it will be many more years yet before China can rival the US in military or economic terms.

      The World Bank said the shrinking of Chinas economy was due to exaggerated estimates based on less reliable data in the past. It was the first time that China had participated in the World Banks International Comparison Program and the first time since 1985 that India had participated.

      Indias economy also shrank by 40 per cent, according to the the tables, which ranked it the worlds fourth largest economy, accounting for 4 per cent of output.

      ؟(z)examwkk u(png)Փ me(cu)