The expression benchmarking has become one of the fashionable words in current management discussion. The term first appeared in the United States in the 1970s but has now gained world wide recognition. But what exactly does it mean and should your company be practicing it?
One straightforward definition of benchmarking comes from Chris Tether managing director of a New Zealand-based consultancy firm specializing in this area. “Benchmarking involves learning about your own practices, learning about the best practices of others, and then making changes for improvement that will enable you to meet or beat the best in the world.” The essential element is not simply imitating what other companies do but being able to adapt the best of other firms’ practices to your own situation.Instead of aiming to improve only against previous performance and scores, companies can use benchmarking to inject an element of imagination and common sense into their search for progress. It is a process which forces companies to look closely at those activities which they may have been taking for granted and comparing them with the actives of other world-beating companies. Self-criticism is at the heart of the process although in some cases this may upset managers who are reluctant to question long established practices.
The process of identifying best practice in other companies does not just mean looking closely at your competitors. It might also include studying companies which use similar processes to your own, even though they are producing different goods. The point is to look at the process rather than the product. For example, Italian computer company Arita wanted to improve the quality of its technical manuals and handbooks. Instead of looking at manuals produced by other computer companies, Arita turned to a publisher of popular handbooks such as cookery books, railway timetables and car repair manuals. As Arita’s Technical Director Claudio Benclii says, “All of these handbooks are communicating complex information in a simple way - exactly what we are aiming to do. And in many cases they succeed far better than any computer company.”
There is some disagreement between benchmarking specialists as to the best methods to follow when starting a benchmarking exercise in your firm. Everyone agrees that the process must have the full approval of senior management but that it is best carried out by a comparatively small team. Some consultants feel this should be as small as three people but most favor a team of between five and eight at least one of whom should have some prior knowledge of the benchmarking process. In practice this often means bringing in an outside consultant ? at least at the beginning. Once the team is assembled there can be anything from three to five formal stages in the process different approaches but whatever the exact technique benchmarking can only work if everyone in the company from top to bottom is committed to change.
15. According to the writer, benchmarking must always involve
A. changing your activities on the basis of new information.
B. Copying exactly what your competitors do.
C. Identifying the best company in your market.
D. Collaborating with other companies in the same field.
16. Some managers may resist benchmarking because
A. it takes their activities for granted.
B. It makes them examine the way they work.
C. It makes others question their efficiency.
D. It gives them a lot of extra work.
17. What sort of companies should you compare yours with?
A. those producing similar goods
B. those communicating most effectively
C. those using similar processes
D. those leading the domestic market
18. Anita found that a publishing company could
A. make more money than a computer firm.
B. Produce technical manuals for them
C. Show them how to improve their own manuals
D. Help them move into new markets
19. Benchmarking specialists agree that in order to succeed there must be
A. a team of no more than three people
B. total support from top managers
C. a fixed timetable for the process
D. an outside consultant it the team
20. What is the writer’s purpose in writing this article?
A. to recommend the process of benchmarking
B. to criticize firms that do not carry out benchmarking
C. to give tactual information about benchmarking
D. to explain why benchmarking does not suit every firm
上一篇：劍橋商務英語：閱讀模擬題二
初級會計職稱中級會計職稱經(jīng)濟師注冊會計師證券從業(yè)銀行從業(yè)會計實操統(tǒng)計師審計師高級會計師基金從業(yè)資格期貨從業(yè)資格稅務師資產(chǎn)評估師國際內(nèi)審師ACCA/CAT價格鑒證師統(tǒng)計資格從業(yè)
一級建造師二級建造師二級建造師造價工程師土建職稱公路檢測工程師建筑八大員注冊建筑師二級造價師監(jiān)理工程師咨詢工程師房地產(chǎn)估價師 城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃師結(jié)構(gòu)工程師巖土工程師安全工程師設備監(jiān)理師環(huán)境影響評價土地登記代理公路造價師公路監(jiān)理師化工工程師暖通工程師給排水工程師計量工程師
人力資源考試教師資格考試出版專業(yè)資格健康管理師導游考試社會工作者司法考試職稱計算機營養(yǎng)師心理咨詢師育嬰師事業(yè)單位教師招聘理財規(guī)劃師公務員公選考試招警考試選調(diào)生村官
執(zhí)業(yè)藥師執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師衛(wèi)生資格考試衛(wèi)生高級職稱執(zhí)業(yè)護士初級護師主管護師住院醫(yī)師臨床執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師臨床助理醫(yī)師中醫(yī)執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師中醫(yī)助理醫(yī)師中西醫(yī)醫(yī)師中西醫(yī)助理口腔執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師口腔助理醫(yī)師公共衛(wèi)生醫(yī)師公衛(wèi)助理醫(yī)師實踐技能內(nèi)科主治醫(yī)師外科主治醫(yī)師中醫(yī)內(nèi)科主治兒科主治醫(yī)師婦產(chǎn)科醫(yī)師西藥士/師中藥士/師臨床檢驗技師臨床醫(yī)學理論中醫(yī)理論
