亚洲欧洲国产欧美一区精品,激情五月亚洲色五月,最新精品国偷自产在线婷婷,欧美婷婷丁香五月天社区

      考試首頁 | 考試用書 | 培訓(xùn)課程 | 模擬考場(chǎng)  
        當(dāng)前位置:考試網(wǎng) >> ACCA/CAT >> CAT考試 >> 文章內(nèi)容
        

      ACCAF2管理會(huì)計(jì)必會(huì)題:Performancemeasurement

      考試網(wǎng)  [ 2017年6月23日 ] 【

        Question:A division of a service company is aware that its recent poor performance has been attributable to a low standard of efficiency amongst the workforce, compared to rival firms. The company is adopting a balanced scorecard approach to setting performance targets. As part of its objective of closing the skills gap between itself and rival companies, the division's management has set a target of providing at least 40 hours of training each year for all its employees.

        What does this performance target reflect?

        A. A customer perspective

        B. A learning and growth perspective

        C. A finance perspective

        D. An internal process perspective

        The correct answer is: A learning and growth perspective

        A target of providing at least 40 hours of training every year to improve skills and productivity has a learning and growth perspective.

        Question:PH Ltd produces a single product and currently uses absorption costing for its internal management accounting reports. The fixed production overhead absorption rate is $34 per unit. Opening inventories for the year were 100 units and closing inventories were 180 units. The company's management accountant is considering a switch to marginal costing as the inventory valuation basis.

        If marginal costing were used, the marginal costing profit for the year, compared with the profit calculated by absorption costing, would be which of the following?

        A. $2,720 lower

        B. $2,720 higher

        C. $3,400 lower

        D. $3,400 higher

        The correct answer is: $2,720 lower

        解析:If marginal costing is used to value inventory instead of absorption costing, the difference in profits will be equal to the change in inventory volume multiplied by the fixed production overhead absorption rate = 80 units x $34 = $2,720

        Since closing inventory are higher than opening inventories, the marginal costing profit will be lower that the absorption costing profit (so $2,720 higher is incorrect). This is because the marginal costing profit does not 'benefit' from the increase in the amount of fixed production overhead taken to inventory (rather than to the income statement).

        If you selected $3,400 lower or $3,400 higher you based the difference on 100 units of opening inventory.

      將考試網(wǎng)添加到收藏夾 | 每次上網(wǎng)自動(dòng)訪問考試網(wǎng) | 復(fù)制本頁地址,傳給QQ/MSN上的好友 | 申請(qǐng)鏈接 TOP
      關(guān)于本站  網(wǎng)站聲明  廣告服務(wù)  聯(lián)系方式  站內(nèi)導(dǎo)航
      Copyright © 2006-2019 考試網(wǎng)(Examw.com) All Rights Reserved  營(yíng)業(yè)執(zhí)照